John Shufeldt, MD, JD, MBA, FACEP
STATES HAVE ENACTED STATUTES, and courts have proffered
an abundance of case law on the treatment of
minors. There have been no reports of physicians being
held liable for rendering emergent or urgent care to
minors prior to obtaining parental consent.
Still, informed consent issues surrounding the care and
treatment of minors are often a source of confusion and are, at
best, problematic.
Essentially, competency to give consent is determined in the
same way for both minors and adults:
Does the individual understand what he or she is consenting
to?
Can the person paraphrase the information given?
Can the patient think in the abstract and have an understanding
of the future consequences of either accepting
or refusing the treatment?
Is the decision entered into voluntarily, without duress?
Given the nature of the decision, does the patient understand
the risks and benefits and its reversibility?
If a minor is legally capable of giving consent, the patient’s right
of confidentiality also attaches. However, it is prudent to try to persuade
the minor to allow notification of the guardian so the parent
can take part in the decision-making process; this is especially
preferable if the minor is seriously ill. Statutes allowing minors
to consent do not mandate parental notification unless the failure
to do so would place the minor in additional risk.
Historically, issues surrounding parental availability were
uncommon. Today, however, family dynamics have changed and
children may be left unattended for long periods or left in
the care of siblings, neighbors, grandparents or babysitters. During
these times, who can consent for the child’s care? Who can
refuse care and how does an urgent care provider sift through
this web to do what is best for the child?
Low Risk: Emergency Care
The most clear-cut scenario is when an emergency situation
exists. Care should never be delayed while waiting for consent
when evaluating a child with an emergency condition. In an
emergent or urgent situation, any patient young or old can be
treated without consent, since consent is implied. What constitutes
an emergency condition is broadly defined and courts are
reluctant to second guess a practitioner's subjective interpretation
surrounding the facts of the situation.
Parental consent to treat the minor is also not required in
cases of alleged or suspected child abuse; the proper governmental
authorities must be contacted in such a situation.
In some states, a caretaker can assume a parental role by acting
in loco parentis (in the place of a parent). However, physicians
should still attempt to contact the parents as soon as possible
and document those attempts in the medical record.
Most importantly, again: urgent care physicians should
never delay the urgent or emergent care of a minor while
waiting for consent. Common sense should prevail; thus,
physicians should be guided by the proviso to provide what is
in the patient's best interest.
The Question of Competence
In some instances, a minor is deemed competent to consent for
his own treatment. This competence is closely aligned to cognitive
ability, as opposed to being strictly tied to chronological
age. All states allow a minor to consent for the diagnosis and
treatment of drug- and alcohol-related issues and for the diagnosis
and treatment of sexually transmitted disease. Some
states also allow for the diagnosis and treatment of issues
surrounding pregnancy, HIV, and AIDS.
Many state's statutes also address consent issues surrounding
an emancipated minor. However, the definition of an
emancipated minor varies from state to state. Some of the typical
conditions which define "emancipation" are marriage,
minors in the military, pregnancy, minors emancipated by
court order or decree, minor mothers, and minors who are supporting
themselves.
When minors present in a non-emergency situation, or with
a condition other than the aforementioned exceptions, consent
for treatment must be obtained from the parent or guardian.
For routine health matters, consent may be given by any
number of persons acting in loco parentis (e.g., foster
guardians, adult relatives, officials in child welfare agencies,
or the juvenile justice system). If the minor is not legally competent
to consent for treatment and presents with a guardian,
the provider should still make every effort to inform the
minor patient of the treatment to the extent of their cognitive
capacity.
When Minors Refuse Care
The clinician should be extremely wary of treating a minor
patient who declines treatment. If a minor refuses routine
care after its explanation and has an intelligent understanding
of the treatment and available options, a provider who continues
with the treatment over the minor's reasonable objections
runs a considerable legal risk unless a medical emergency
makes the treatment time critical.
If the treatment is needed in the immediate future, the
provider should obtain a court order before proceeding; this can
be obtained directly via the judicial system or indirectly through
the state's child protection agency.
If the treatment is not necessary in the reasonably foreseeable
future, the minor should be discharged with an appropriate
follow-up referral.
Generally, providers should not order drug or alcohol screens
on a minor unless medically justified.
Summary
Urgent care physicians should have an understanding of their
own state's statutes surrounding the treatment of minors. To
date, courts have not held physicians who acted in good faith
liable for initiating the emergent or urgent care of minors.
Generally, you should be guided by what is in the patient's best
interest; however, it is important to document your attempts to
reach a guardian and why you believed the minor's condition
warranted treatment prior to obtaining parental consent.
In non-emergent situations, physicians should proceed with
extreme caution with minors who do not meet the criteria for
legal capacity or emancipation and who refuse care despite the
ability to make an intelligent decision.
Minors who present without a parent and whose condition
does not require treatment in the foreseeable future
should be discharged with appropriate follow-up. It is prudent
for the urgent care physician to form relationships with
local emergency departments, child protective agencies, and the
courts to prospectively formulate guidelines surrounding the
care and treatment of minors.
 |
John Shufeldt is chief executive officer of NextCare, Inc. and sits on the Editorial Board of JUCM The Journal of Urgent Care Medicine. |